Advertising

Showing posts with label High Performance Computing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label High Performance Computing. Show all posts

Monday, 17 October 2016

Unknown

Google’s Making Its Own Chips Now. Time for Intel to Freak Out

Google’s Making Its Own Chips Now. Time for Intel to Freak Out

The Internet’s most powerful company sent a few shock waves through the tech world yesterday when it revealed that a new custom-designed chip helps run what is surely the future of its vast online empire: artificial intelligence.

Google’s Making Its Own Chips Now. Time for Intel to Freak Out

In building its own chip, Google has taken yet another step along a path that has already remade the tech industry in enormous ways. Over the past decade, the company has designed all sorts of new hardware for the massive data centers that underpin its myriad online services, including computer servers, networking gear, and more. As it created services of unprecedented scope and size, it needed a more efficient breed of hardware to run these services. Over the years, so many other Internet giants have followed suit, forcing a seismic shift in the worldwide hardware market.

With its new chip, Google’s aim is the same: unprecedented efficiency. To take AI to new heights, it needs a chip that can do more in less time while consuming less power. But the effect of this chip extends well beyond the Google empire. It threatens the future of commercial chip makers like Intel and nVidia—particularly when you consider Google’s vision for the future. According to Urs Hölzle, the man most responsible for the global data center network that underpins the Google empire, this new custom chip is just the first of many.

No, Google will not sell its chips to other companies. It won’t directly compete with Intel or nVidia. But with its massive data centers, Google is by far the largest potential customer for both of those companies. At the same time, as more and more businesses adopt the cloud computing services offered by Google, they’ll be buying fewer and fewer servers (and thus chips) of their own, eating even further into the chip market.

Google’s Making Its Own Chips

Indeed, Google revealed its new chip as a way of promoting the cloud services that let businesses and coders tap into its AI engines and build them into their own applications. As Google tries to sell other companies on the power of its AI, it’s claiming—in rather loud ways—that it boasts the best hardware for running this AI, hardware that no other company has.

Google’s Need for Speed
Google’s new chip is called the Tensor Processing Unit, or TPU. That’s because it helps run TensorFlow, the software engine that drives the Google’s deep neural networks, networks of hardware and software that can learn particular tasks by analyzing vast amounts of data. Other tech giants typically run their deep neural nets with graphics processing units, or GPUs—chips that were originally designed to render images for games and other graphics-heavy applications. These are well-suited to running the types of calculations that drive deep neural networks. But Google says it has built a chip that’s even more efficient.

According to Google, it tailored the TPU specifically to machine learning so that it needs fewer transistors to run each operation. That means it can squeeze more operations into the chip with each passing second.


For now, Google is using both TPUs and GPUs to run its neural nets. Hölzle declined to go into specifics on how exactly Google was using its TPUs, except to say that they handle “part of the computation” needed to drive voice recognition on Android phones. But he said that Google would be releasing a paper describing the benefits of its chip and that Google will continue to design new chips that handle machine learning in other ways. Eventually, it seems, this will push GPUs out of the equation. “They’re already going away a little,” Hölzle says. “The GPU is too general for machine learning. It wasn’t actually built for that.”

That’s not something nVidia wants to hear. As the world’s primary seller of GPUs, nVidia is now pushing to expand its own business into the AI realm. As Hölzle points out, the latest nVidia GPU offers a mode specifically for machine learning. But clearly, Google wants the change to happen faster. Much faster.

The Smartest Chip
In the meantime, other companies, most notably Microsoft, are exploring another breed of chip. The field-programmable gate array, or FPGA, is a chip you can re-program to perform specific tasks. Microsoft has tested FPGAs with machine learning, and Intel, seeing where this market was going, recently acquired a company that sells FPGAs.

Some analysts think that’s the smarter way to go. An FPGA provides far more flexibility, says Patrick Moorhead, the president and principal analyst at Moor Insights and Strategy, a firm that closely follows the chip business. Moorhead wonders if the new Google TPU is “overkill,” pointing out that such a chip takes at least six months to build—a long time in the incredibly competitive marketplace in which the biggest Internet companies compete.

But Google doesn’t want that flexibility. More than anything, it wants speed. Asked why Google built its chip from scratch rather than using an FPGA, Hölzle said: “It’s just much faster.”

Core Business
Hölzle also points out that Google’s chip doesn’t replace CPUs, the central processing units at the heart of every computer server. The search giant still needs these chips to run the tens of thousands of machines in its data centers, and CPUs are Intel’s main business. Still, if Google is willing to build its own chips just for AI, you have to wonder if it would go so far as to design its own CPUs as well.

Hölzle plays down the possibility. “You want to solve problems that are not solved,” he says. In other words, CPUs are a mature technology that pretty much works as it should. But he also said that Google wants healthy competition in the chip market. In other words, it wants to buy from many sellers—not just, say, Intel. After all, more competition means lower prices for Google. As Hölzle explains, expanding its options is why Google is working with the OpenPower Foundation, which seeks to offer chip designs that anyone can use and modify.

That’s a powerful idea, and a potentially powerful threat to the world’s biggest chip makers. According to Shane Rau, an analyst with research firm IDC, Google buys about 5 percent of all server CPUs sold on Earth. Over a recent year-long period, he says, Google bought about 1.2 million chips. And most of those likely came from Intel. (In 2012, Intel exec Diane Bryant told WIRED that Google bought more server chips from Intel than all but five other companies—and those were all companies that sell servers.)

Whatever its plans for the CPU, Google will continue to explore chips specifically suited to machine learning. It will be several years before we really know what works and what doesn’t. After all, neural networks are constantly evolving as well. “We’re learning all the time,” he says. “It’s not clear to me what the final answer is.” And as it learns, you can bet that the world’s chip makers will be watching.
   
Read More
Unknown

High Performance Computing Market - Opportunities and Forecasts, 2014 - 2022

High Performance Computing is a practice to aggregate computing power that delivers high performance capabilities in handling large number problems in science, business or engineering fields.HPC systems involve all types of servers and micro servers that are being used for highly computational or data intensive tasks. Currently, as HPC has been firmly linked to the economic competitiveness and scientific advances it is becoming important to nations. The worldwide study showcases, 97% of the companies have adopted supercomputing platforms and says that they won’t survive without it.
High Performance Computing Market

Faster computing capabilities of micro servers or HPC systems, improved performance efficiency and smarter deployment & management with high quality of service are some key factors driving the growth of HPC market. The major challenges for these HPC systems are power, cooling system management and storage & data management. The importance of storage & data management would continue to grow in future. In additions to this, software hurdles continues to grow, which are restraining the growth of HPC market. HPC technology is being rapidly adopted by the academic institutions and various industries to build reliable and robust products that would enable to maintain a competitive edge in the business. Various vendors are also targeting to provide high performance converged technology solutions. As this trend is gaining significant relevance, the market is growing steadily and it would continue its growth in future.
High Performance Computing market analysis by Components
HPC involves various components and some of them could be listed as Hardware and architecture, software and system management and professional services. Hardware components are the most essential parts in any HPC system. The efficiency of the system is totally dependent on the hardware entities in HPC. Hardware and architecture segment of HPC includes memory capacity (storage), energy management, servers and network devices. Servers consist of super computer, divisional, departmental &workgroup. Supercomputers and departmental units are the fastest elements to be sold in hardware and architecture section. Another essential component of HPC is software and management system. It comprises of middleware, programming tools, performance optimization tools, cluster management and fabric management. Finally, professional services provided are design & consulting, integration & deployment and Training & outsourcing.
High Performance Computing market analysis by Deployment

High Performance Computing market analysis by Deployment
The different types of deployment methods of HPC are Cloud based and on-premise based methods. Cloud deployment is most popular in the industry, as cloud-computing technologies are popularly adopted by the players in different industries. The research shows that cloud technology market is expected to grow due to its high adoption rate, while the usage on-premise deployment method would decline slowly.
High Performance Computing market analysis by Application
The major application sections of HPC are High Performance technical computing and High performance business computing. Technical computing of the HPC includes various sectors such as Government, Chemicals, Bio-sciences, Academic institutions, Consumer products, Energy, Electronics and Others. High performance data analysis is being used in government sector for national security & crime fighting. In addition to this, HPCs are used in fraud detection and customer acquisition/retention across other sectors. High Performance Business Computing includes media entertainment, online gaming, retail, financial service, ultra scale internet, transportation and others.
High Performance Computing market analysis by Geography
The high performance computing market is being analyzed in different geographic regions such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and LAMEA. North America is the largest market for HPC technology due to the technological advancements and early adoption of technology in the region followed by Europe.
Competitive Landscape
The key market players are adopting product launch as their principle strategy to provide high performance solutions in different industries. Cisco is providing high performance computing solution for financial services that overcome low latency requirements, high message rate and throughput requirements, predictability to avoid jitter & spikes and building large computing grids in cost effective manner.
Some major players in HPC market are IBM, Intel, Fujistu, AMD, Oracle, Microsoft, HP, Dell, Hitachi Data System and Cisco.
HIGH LEVEL ANALYSIS
Study of the market showcases the current market trends, market structures, driving factors, limitations and opportunities of the global HPC market. Porter’s Five Force Model helps in analyzing the market forces, barriers, strengths, etc., of the global market. Bargaining power of the buyer is low as the product is highly differentiated and threat of backward integration is low. The suppliers in this market are more concentrated than buyers, due to which the bargaining power of suppliers is high. Threat of substitutes in the global market is high as the switching costs are minimal. As HPC is a novel concept, threat of new entrants in the industry is high, while, the moderate number of market players leads to moderate intersegment rivalry in the market. Value chain analysis helps in analyzing the role of key stakeholders in the supply chain of the market and would provide new entrants with knowledge about the value chain of the existing market.
KEY BENEFITS
  • Porters five force’s model helps in analyzing the potential of buyers & suppliers, and the competitive sketch of the market, which would guide the market players to develop strategies accordingly 
  • Assessments are made according to the current business scenario and the future market structure & trends are forecast for the period 2013-2020 by considering 2013 as base year 
  • The analysis gives a wider view of the global market including its market trends, market structure, limiting factors and opportunities 
  • The advantages of the market are analyzed to help the stakeholders identify the opportunistic areas in a comprehensive manner 
  • The value chain analysis provides a systematic study on the key intermediaries involved, which would in turn help the stakeholders in the market to make appropriate strategies 
 
HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MARKET KEY DELIVERABLES
For more information or any query mail at sales@wiseguyreports.com
About Us
Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports understand how essential statistical surveying information is for your organization or association. Therefore, we have associated with the top publishers and research firms all specialized in specific domains, ensuring you will receive the most reliable and up to date research data available.
 
Contact Us:
Norah Trent
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
Read More

Wednesday, 12 October 2016

Unknown

Datacenter Efficiencies Through Innovative Cooling

Datacenters that are designed for High Performance Computing  (HPC) applications are more difficult to design and construct than those that are designed for more basic enterprise applications.  Organizations that are creating these datacenters need to be aware of, and design for systems that are expected to run at their maximum or near maximum performance for the lifecycle of the servers. While enterprise datacenters can be designed for less server density and less heat generated per server due to the type of workloads, HPC centers must be designed for higher usage per server. For example, simulations in many domains may run at peak performance (depending on the algorithms) for weeks at a time, while enterprise applications may only need peak performance for short bursts, such as payroll computations.

High Performance Computing Datacenter Efficiencies
Two main buckets of expenses are usually associated with the planning and implementation of a new datacenter, or the upgrade of an existing datacenter to accommodate the latest generation and performance of new server technology. The first and more generally understood one is the Capital Expense, or CAPEX for short. CAPEX is the amount that the organization will pay to purchase a new asset, especially a new physical asset. When creating or upgrading a new datacenter, the CAPEX is the amount paid for the computer servers, racks, storage systems, networking equipment, etc., which will usually be paid once, in the current fiscal year. Many organizations focus on this value in determining the cost of acquiring new systems. However, the recurring cost or Operational Expense (OPEX), over the life of the computer systems will traditionally be higher.  Leading data center operators both understand this and know that reducing OPEX can provide competitive advantage and release budget dollars for investment in more computing capacity.

Reducing OPEX
OPEX is the sum of all of the expenses that an organization will have to pay to keep the servers running. This includes, but is not limited to such items as electricity, cooling (which includes the electricity), construction financing (if new construction was required), and maintenance.

High Performance Computing Datacenter Efficiencies

One of the main costs in operating a data center is the cooling of the servers. When servers that are being used for HPC applications are running at full utilization, the CPUs produce more heat, than when waiting for work to be done. While the performance per watt of CPUs has increased dramatically over the past few decades, HPC installations are built to deliver the maximum performance of the system to the end user.  Today’s modern two socket high end HPC servers can approach a 1,000 watt requirement.  The electricity required for this type of server (while needed for the server in order to run and perform as expected) also includes a significant requirement for the power that is needed in order to cool the servers. CPUs have an envelope of operating temperatures that must be met, or the CPU will likely fail, often with a cascading impact on cluster throughput and reliability.

Datacenter design has focused in recent years on how to place racks and racks of servers in order to isolate and remove the heat that is produced by the servers, mainly the CPUs. Most servers today have been designed to have high speed and redundant fans in the back of the server, so that cool air can be pulled over the CPUS and heat sinks in order to cool them. This results in designing the data center to have hot aisles and cold aisles. For example, two rows of racks of systems may sit back to back. The cooler air from the front of the system is drawn over the hot chips into the hot aisle, and then powerful exhaust fans pull this hot air away from the hot aisles, and cooler air is returned to the cold aisle. Significant expense is required to contain the hot air in the hot aisle and to remove and cool the hot air.

An alternative is to provide cooling of the CPUs much closer to the CPU itself.  If a significant reduction in the hot air that is produced is achievable, then less Computer Room Air Conditioning (CRAC) is needed, reducing OPEX expenses. In addition, higher densities of the servers can be achieved, as less hot air is produced by each server into a given space (the hot aisle). The monetary effect of reducing power consumption is directly related to the overall OPEX. For example, reducing the power consumption by 50 %, can lead to a reduction of 20 + % in total data center power savings.

Asetek In-RackCDU D2C 
Asetek specializes in liquid cooling systems for data centers, servers, workstations, gaming and high performance PCs. For HPC installations, Asetek RackCDU D2C™ (Direct-to-Chip) applies liquid cooling technology directly on the chip itself. Because liquid is 4,000 times better at storing and transferring heat than air, Asetek’s solutions provide immediate and measurable benefits to large and small data centers alike. The Asetek solution consists of a plate that is attached to the top of the processor and provides cold liquid to the chip itself. The hot liquid is then pumped away from the CPU where the liquid can then be chilled. This reduces almost all of the heat from the airflow of the server, reducing the CRAC requirements, which reduces the OPEX accordingly.

While the exact OPEX savings will vary depending on CPU loads, electricity costs, number of servers, and server density per rack, using Asetek cooling products can significantly reduce the OPEX costs for small and large data centers. Asetek has designed a simple calculator to assist in computing the cost savings. It is well worth investigating innovative chip and server cooling solutions in order to keep an HPC datacenter running and producing results faster than previous generations of systems.
Read More
Unknown

Bright Computing Powers HPC Cluster at Oldenburg University

Today Bright Computing announced that Oldenburg University in Germany has once again chosen to renew its license agreement with Bright Computing.

HPC environment
Oldenburg first became a Bright Computing customer in 2011, choosing Bright Cluster Manager to administer its small HPC environment. In recent years the Oldenburg HPC system has grown to a considerable 600-node cluster to provide an increasing amount of compute power to various departments within the university. With a small IT team and limited administration resources available, when it came time to upgrade the university’s IT hardware, the IT Services team at Oldenburg took the decision to continue using the Bright infrastructure management technology to overarch the HPC environment.

“There were three compelling reasons for Oldenburg to choose to reinvest with Bright,” said Dr. Stefan Harfst, Oldenburg University. “Firstly, Bright helps you to get your HPC environment up and running very quickly. Secondly, Bright makes it incredibly easy to manage your HPC environment which takes a lot of pressure of the IT Services team. Thirdly, Bright is a very robust and reliable, so our team is free to focus on other tasks.”

During the evaluation process, Oldenburg considered a number of independent infrastructure management technologies, as well as some open source software. However, the IT Services team chose Bright for its superior set of features and functionality, acknowledging that investing in a tool rather than deploying freeware was easily justifiable.

Haroon Ibrahim, Account Director for Oldenburg at Bright Computing, added; “By Standardising on Bright, Oldenburg is no longer tied to a single hardware vendor and can now install any hardware it likes. Added to this, Bright will enable Oldenburg to continue to scale its cluster, and in the future expand into new areas such as big data.”
Read More
Unknown

Nor-Tech Introduces Portable HPC Clusters for the Oil & Gas Industry

Oct. 11 — Nor-Tech (Northern Computer Technologies), the leading provider of HPC clusters and high performance workstations, just introduced the first portable HPC cluster for the oil and gas industry with a price point starting at $20,000. 
HPC clusters and high performance workstations

Nor-Tech designed the cluster with the understanding that the oil and gas industry is looking for providers:
  • With deep FEA/CFD/CAE experience and an engineering staff that understands the concepts and challenges.
  • With knowledge of all software integration options and assurance of agnostic recommendations.
  • That have the willingness to listen to clients, the ability to understand their needs, and the ability to incorporate those needs into the design.
  • That can deliver a superior cost/performance ratio and a competitive total cost of ownership.
  • That have an excellent reputation within the HPC community, and
  • That offer a strong product lineup backed by quality service and prompt support.
Nor-Tech President and CEO David Bollig said, “Many businesses in the oil and gas industry in particular have been putting off upgrading from a workstation to a cluster even though they know it will dramatically reduce modeling time. Part of the reason is the price and the other part is the anticipated disruption. We’ve been working with clients in just this situation for many years and have perfected the transition process. Our goal is to have clients up and running with their new cluster within a couple hours of delivery. We also back that up with no wait time support.”

Nor-Tech’s cluster was developed with dual goals of mitigating risk and maximizing the speed of obtaining accurate, actionable results at a price within reach of even the smallest oil and gas companies. The cluster aggregates, processes, and interprets a terabyte or more of data originating in simulations, surveys, historical geological sources, etc.

Often, as organizations need more processing power than a single workstation can provide, they will add another workstation. It seems like a cost-saving strategy at first, but as they continue to add workstations, they soon exceed the price of a single cluster—which would also have about 3x the processing power.

“We always recommend the most cost-effective solution for the long term,” Bollig said. “So we do offer high end workstations that may make more sense for start-ups still struggling with desktops.”

About Nor-Tech
2016 HPCwire award finalist, Nor-Tech is renowned throughout the scientific, academic, and business communities for easy to deploy turnkey clusters and expert, no wait time support. All of Nor-Tech’s technology is made by Nor-Tech in Minnesota and supported by Nor-Tech around the world. In addition to HPC clusters, Nor-Tech’s custom technology includes workstations, desktops, and servers for a range of applications including CAE, CFD, and FEA. Nor-Tech engineers average 20+ years of experience and are responsible for significant high performance computing innovations. The company has been in business since 1998 and is headquartered in Burnsville, Minn. just outside of Minneapolis. To contact Nor-Tech call 952-808-1000/toll free: 877-808-1010 or visit http://www.nor-tech.com. For more information on Nor-Tech’s clusters visit: http://www.nor-tech.com/solutions/hpc.


Read More

Wednesday, 21 September 2016

Unknown

CloudLightning Report Looks at Barriers to HPC in the Cloud

The CloudLightning Project in Europe has published preliminary results from a survey on Barriers to Using HPC in the Cloud.

cloud computing for HPC

"Cloud computing is transforming the utilization and efficiency of IT infrastructures across all sectors. Historically, cloud computing has not been used for high performance computing (HPC) to the same degree as other use cases for a number of reasons. This executive briefing is a preliminary report of a larger study on demand-side barriers and drivers of cloud computing adoption for HPC. A more comprehensive report and analysis will be published later in 2016. From June to August 2016, the CloudLightning project surveyed over 170 HPC discrete end users worldwide in the academic, commercial and government sectors on their HPC use, perceived drivers and barriers to using cloud computing, and uses of cloud computing for HPC."

cloud computing for HPC workloads

As shown in Figure 2, trust in cloud computing would appear to be a significant barrier to adopting cloud computing for HPC workloads. Data management concerns dominate the responses. This is not surprising given the large number of bio-science and university and academic respondents within the sample. The main technical barriers relate to communication speeds. This reflects a perceived lack of cloud infrastructure capable of meeting the communications and I/O requirements of high-end technical computing. Government policy is again ranked low it would seem it is neither a driver nor a barrier. Unsurprisingly availability and capital expenditure are not barriers reflecting their positive impact on adoption.

According to the report, there is unlikely to be a full shift of high performance computing workloads to the cloud in the short term however there is evidence of demand to meet the capacity limitations of internal infrastructures including use cases for testing the viability of the cloud or specific software for various use cases. This is consistent with previous research.

"Funded by the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 Program for Research and Innovation, CloudLightning brings together eight project partners from five countries across Europe. The project proposes to create a new way of provisioning heterogeneous cloud resources to deliver services, specified by the user, using a bespoke service description language. Our goal is to address energy inefficiencies particularly in the use of resources and consequently to deliver savings to the cloud provider and the cloud consumer in terms of reduced power consumption and improved service delivery, with hyperscale systems particularly in mind."


Read More

Sunday, 18 September 2016

Unknown

Intel's new PC, IoT chief brings fresh ideas to the veteran chip maker

Intel's second-in-command Venkata Renduchintala is feeling at home with his new company after he switched over from Qualcomm
IoT chief brings
 Venkata Renduchintala is president of Intel's Client and Internet of Things (IoT) businesses and Systems Architecture Group.

Intel is now more than just a PC company. At industry events, the company's keynotes feature drones flying around, robots walking on stage and musicians creating tunes from wearables. The chip maker is helping BMW build an autonomous car, will sell modems to Apple, and is leading the development of next-generation 5G cellular networks. For all these new markets, it will provide chip and data-center technologies.

The transformation is happening partly under the leadership of Venkata Renduchintala, president of the Client and Internet of Things (IoT) Businesses and Systems Architecture Group at Intel. As Intel's second-in-command, he helped cut struggling products like mobile CPUs and sharpened the company's focus on IoT, servers, and connectivity.

Hired from rival Qualcomm late last year, he's an outsider trying to rid Intel of its historical resistance to change. He's also bringing fresh ideas and wholesale changes to  Intel, which promises to bring a new dynamic to the Silicon Valley institution.

IDG News Service spoke with him on a range of topics including VR headsets, IoT, autonomous cars, competitors and the decision to cut products. This is an edited version of the discussion.

IDGNS: How have you settled into your new job? What drew you to Intel?

It's been a really interesting process of acclimation. It's a great mixture of feeling, like an organization where I think my experience and my interests can really help the journey [CEO] Brian [Krzanich] wants to undertake with the company. The scale at which Intel can play is probably going to be very difficult for others to match if you look across, client, networking and the data center groups. The goal is to be able to think as one Intel.

IDGNS: There have been questions on how you would fit into Intel, which has a closed culture and history of promoting executives internally. Many people hired from external companies haven't worked out.

One thing that's really important to understand is that Intel is a company of tremendous heritage. I'm not coming in to fix anything. I'm coming in hopefully to add another dimension and an important ingredient to the management team that Brian has at his disposal. It requires me to respect what Intel has been able to achieve and the caliber of the management team and the brands assimilated. I don't think Brian hired me to maintain the status quo. I think what he wanted was a strong ingredient of outside-in thinking complementing the original thoughts. I'm feeling very comfortable now in being able to feel like I've got a good bunch of colleagues who know where I'm coming from; we can speak straight to each other and we can actually have really good discussions of meritocracy.

IDGNS: You had to make some decisions on cutting products Intel has worked on for years as the company's priorities were reset. How tough was it?

When you come into a company you have a degree of objectivity that isn't tainted by your attachments to the genesis of certain projects. For me it was a fairly structured, objective discussion where you make decisions in a transparent and open manner. As long as you can walk people through your thinking, you can take what was very controversial and make it very logical. I'm passionate about technology but I'm also passionate about profitability and how the two are married in a seamlessly reinforcing way.

IDGNS: What's the reasoning behind cutting mobile processors to focus on modems?

First of all, we rationalized what we were spending our R&D on. We had a couple of mobile SoC products that I don't think were worthy to continue to conclusion. That doesn't mean to say we're no longer doing mobile platforms. On the mobile platform side, my commitment is to talk less and do more. When we have something to say we'll talk about it.

On the modem side, it's a fundamental technology and this is where I think it comes down to being as indelible for us as our competence in CPU or GPU. We've set ourselves up with a very interesting road-map, but more importantly, we've established a degree of credibility, relevance and importance as a key technology partner with a number of key players in the industry that I think is really important.

IDGNS: What are your top priorities and goals?

I have three uber-level goals. One is to continue to drive our client computing business to a position of stable profitability in the face of a slowly declining [market]. I think we're doing well in that area. The second is to grow and scale our IoT business from something that's very interesting to something that's really substantial in the longer term. The IoT business for us is a microcosm of the entire company coming together -- we're creating a type of all-for-one, one-for-all mentality. The third is to maintain a degree of vibrancy in the technology leadership of our entire systems architecture organization. It's developing all the core technologies that really moves the competitive needle forward.

IDGNS: Intel's untethered mixed-reality headset called Project Alloy was big news at IDF. What are the expectations from Alloy and how are things going?

The whole point of having tetherless VR is a big deal. Everything we're doing in Alloy we're going to open-source. We can take VR and evolve it from the very rudimentary definitions today of [VR] in a smart phone that you clip into some kind of visor. You can move it to a capable, embedded PC that's driving two to three teraflops of computing and generate a really immersive experience. That was really it -- taking ideas out from the lab, productizing them, solving all those problems of integration, figuring out how RealSense and depth camera fits into all of that, figuring out how to do merged reality,  and saying "now go scale the ecosystem."

IDGNS: Is the VR headset the new PC?

I think it's another very interesting growth opportunity for the PC. I think it can generate a specific class of products in its own right. It will generate different segmentation points and probably a custom piece of silicon built on the PC platform that amplify the use case. So we're very excited about the whole VR space.

IDGNS: Intel hasn't given up on Moore's Law, though many believe it is reaching its end. How is Intel preparing for a future when manufacturing reaches atomic scale, and how will chips look beyond Kaby Lake?

Nobody inside Intel is coming anywhere near the kind-of-like fatalistic conclusions about where Moore's Law is. Intel has had a stellar track record in delivering node generation like clockwork. Maybe we've moved from a two-year to a two-and-a-half-year cadence, but we already see light at the end of the tunnel. We will continue to drive process technology and nobody is calling timeout on anything. We're working hard on 7-nanometer, we're talking about pathfinding for 5-nanometer. All of that is in the throes. We made a great announcement on Kaby Lake -- that's using an evolution of 14-nanometer transistor geometry that gave a substantially improved user experience compared to Skylake. We're going to continue to do more of that as we continue to drive process leadership.

IDGNS: Are you happy with your current chip line-up -- Kaby Lake for PCs, and Atom for IoT?

We have a competent portfolio of products. I'm in no way shape or form concluding they are complete and aren't going to be benefited from augmentation. For me I think it's really wanting to understand the use cases a lot more. I don't see an IoT strategy for Intel being one where everything is delivered by Intel. It's integrating a number of different technologies that could be indigenous to Intel, or could be created by other companies, but managed in a way where people could look at Intel as somebody providing the overarching framework of integration.

IDGNS: IoT is a big part of Intel's future. What's the strategy for that market?

That's a significant business. I think we're just starting. As you see the advent of autonomous driving vehicles, you see robots and drones start to ship in scale: those are very high value opportunities for us. We characterize our IoT interests into three verticals: industrial, transportation and retail -- all of them have an end-to-end dimension where we're providing a client environment, the networking infrastructure and the data analytics platform that drives all of that through industry partnerships.

IDGNS: Would in any way the ARM foundry deal help Intel achieve its goals in IoT and other areas? Would you be open to the idea of taking an ARM CPU license, as an example?

Open to? Yes. My view is fairly straightforward -- that Intel's IoT plan has to not only be able to harmoniously integrate Intel-based microprocessors and MCUs, it has to be able to aggregate and harmoniously integrate a plethora of different types of MCUs, whether it be ARM-based, MIPS-based, or proprietary MCUs. All of them have the ability to monitor, sense data that they want to get on to an information highway of some kind. Our ability to [support] many different client environments is going to be a necessity in any vertical IoT strategy we have. There are many areas in the ARM ecosystem where Intel can pragmatically play in for its own benefit. I'm a big believer in paying respect to established ecosystems.

IDGNS: Self-driving cars are a big deal for Intel. Could you talk about projects in the pipeline?

Our goal is to provide the type of computing power that dwarfs anything that exists in a car today, but basically make it mainstream. What we're doing on our Xeon Phi processor for machine learning and deep learning, what we're doing in computer vision and also supplemented by radar and lidar. Being able to aggregate that data, generate intelligence, make decisions on it with assistance from machine and deep learning algorithms -- that's all happening as we speak.

IDGNS: How do you see the autonomous car market evolving?

I see the first explosive area to be in the urban transportation environment where  services like Uber and Lyft will evolve and develop. There's going to be a lot of experimentation and path-finding to do in addition to technology creation. We're probably talking about a decade away. Stamina to invest is going to be really important;  those that have the stamina to stay the course are going to win big.

IDGNS: Nvidia is approaching the automotive markets aggressively with its GPUs, how will you compete?

I have a great deal of respect for Nvidia. But every time I think of Nvidia, I think about Californian wine where they can make great wine but it contains only one grape -- great Cabernet Sauvignon or a great Chardonnay. I love French wines and French wines are blends where you need to be great at growing Cabernet, great at growing Merlot, great at growing Cabernet Franc. The art is in the mixture. That's the benefit Intel has. We have GPU, we have CPU, we have custom silicon, we have embedded storage, we have FPGA. Nvidia's going to basically say "I've got GPUs and I've got GPUs and I've got GPUs." Great strategy, but it doesn't give anywhere near the extensibility, flexibility and scalability that Intel is able to offer.

IDGNS: How will 5G influence changes in the way devices are made and work?

5G is as much about the transformation of the network and the infrastructure as it is the client environment. [There is] going to be an even greater demand from mobile broadband bandwidth, people are going to want tens of gigabytes per second, if not hundreds of gigabytes per second. We're going to see much greater pervasiveness of client devices. If you talk about autonomous vehicles or delivering health services over a mobile network, you need to be able to make life or death decisions based on that. The network has to transform and the data center becomes a much higher order entity that's focused on massive data analytics that orchestrates that entire network.
Read More